| Federal Employers' Liability Act |
| |
| The Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA) is not a workers' compensation statute. Rather, it is an alternative avenue by which railroad workers who are injured on the job may be compensated. The FELA allows an injured railroad worker to pursue a negligence action against his employer for lost wages, medical costs, pain and suffering, and permanent and partial disability. Should the injury result in the railroad worker's death, the FELA also authorizes an action by the worker's surviving dependents. The damages recoverable by a dependent include those for pain and suffering, funeral expenses, and that part of the worker's earnings that were actually used to support the dependent. Notably, though, the employee's contributory negligence will diminish any recovery.More... |
| |
| Procedure under the Black Lung Benefits Act |
| |
| To recover benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act, a miner, his surviving spouse, or his surviving dependents must file a claim with the appropriate government office, usually a Social Security or Labor Department office. From the date that the miner has been made aware of the medical determination that he is totally disabled from pneumoconiosis, he has three years in which to file a claim for benefits. This time limit is subject to exception only for extraordinary circumstances. The miner's surviving spouse and dependents have no time limitations for filing their claims.More... |
| |
| Violation of Law or Commission of Crime |
| |
| As a general rule, an employee is not necessarily withdrawn from workers' compensation eligibility if he is injured while violating a law or committing a crime in furtherance of his job duties. Most often, the violation of a law or commission of a crime will affect an employee's receipt of benefits if, in the applicable state, it constitutes "wilful misconduct" or is the subject of its very own statutory provision giving a defense to the employer. The violation of a statute does not ipso facto equal "wilful misconduct." Rather, flagrancy and knowledge on the part of the employee are generally required for an act to rise to the level of "wilful." More... |
| |
| Uninsured Motorist Insurance, No-Fault Insurance |
| |
| and Workers' Compensation)More... |
| |
| "Third Person" Entities |
| |
| An employee who is injured during the course of his employment may, in addition to workers' compensation, seek damages in a third party action. Whether the employee of a subsidiary may sue the parent corporation, or vice versa, to recover damages for his injury is dependent on the jurisdiction. Though most often an affiliated corporation, such as a subsidiary or its parent, strives to maintain its independence from the other entity so as to be shielded by the corporate veil, in cases of worker injury such entities claim mutual identity to be protected from suit by the "employer's" immunity. In other words, if the injured employee works for the subsidiary, but files a third party action against the parent, the parent will argue that it stands in the shoes of the subsidiary as the employer and is thus immune from suit. This argument may very well work if the subsidiary is wholly owned and controlled by the parent.More... |
| |
